Interesting what Michael Saylor just said about Satoshi Nakamoto. The founder of MicroStrategy criticizes the New York Times' investigation into the Bitcoin creator's identity and makes a good point.

Saylor emphasizes something that is often overlooked: as long as no one can prove ownership through a cryptographic signature with Satoshi's actual keys, all theories about the true identity are ultimately just speculation. That’s actually pretty logical when you think about it.

There are constantly new theories and guesses about who Satoshi might be. But Michael Saylor sums it up: these are all just narrative stories without real proof. The debate over Nakamoto's identity has been going on for years and will probably stay that way.

The mystery surrounding the Bitcoin founder has simply become part of the lore. Michael Saylor is right — without real cryptographic proof, it’s pointless to commit to a specific theory. It’s interesting that voices from the crypto community are now also critically commenting on such investigations.