just saw michael saylor going off on the nyt for their whole satoshi nakamoto investigation thing. he's basically saying like, unless someone actually proves they own satoshi's keys and can sign something with them, all this speculation is just noise. which... fair point honestly? the guy's got a point - everyone's got a theory about who satoshi really is but nobody's got proof. saylor making it clear that the mystery stays a mystery unless someone actually proves ownership cryptographically. kind of wild how many conspiracy theories float around when the answer could literally just be verified with a signature. what do you think - is the nyt wasting time on this or is it actually worth investigating?