Lately I've been reviewing project documents on re-staking and shared security. Basically, it's about splitting the same sense of security into multiple layers to sell, and while the returns seem to stack up, the risks also accumulate. But everyone tends to treat the risk part as "default safe." I'm now shifting from a "follow" mindset to a "unfollow" one: not because I doubt it, but because I realize many discussions stop at APR and narratives, without clear details on slash trigger conditions, who takes the blame, how to rollback if something goes wrong... Almost no one explains these clearly. By the way, the NFT royalty dispute is similar—everyone is shouting that creators need income and the market needs liquidity, but the real challenge is in the implementation details of the mechanisms. Anyway, I’ll only focus on what can clearly define the safety boundaries and match the data, without adding illusions.