Recently, I’ve been checking whether a project is "trustworthy or not" instead of looking at the K-line first. I go to GitHub and audit reports instead... But honestly, beginners shouldn’t force themselves to read the code, as it’s easy to get overwhelmed. My simple method is to look at the update rhythm: Is there long-term maintenance? Are issues being responded to? Are the upgrade notes written clearly for users, not just empty words like "we’ve completed an epic iteration"?

Don’t just look at the cover logo of the audit report either. I scan for high-risk issues to see if they’ve been genuinely fixed, and whether the fixes are reasonable, preferably with a secondary review. Then there’s multi-signature upgrades: Who are the signers? What’s the threshold? Is there a delay (timelock)? At least don’t let "decentralization" end up as a one-click hot update—that’s quite humorous.

On the macro side, they’re talking about rate cut expectations, the US dollar index, and risk assets rising and falling together. I become even more cautious: when the environment heats up, stories get told faster, but trustworthiness doesn’t necessarily rise along with it. That’s it for now; I’ll slowly fill in the timeline.