I woke up after the alarm went off three times, casually scrolling and seeing yet another debate about whether secondary royalties should be paid. Honestly, many people claim to "support creators," but once something is sold, they start nitpicking: why should I share a part of my earnings with you? I understand, when the market is bad, everyone wants to hold onto more of their money.



But the project team claims royalties are a matter of faith, while their contracts are full of adjustable parameters and permissions that seem like backdoors, and the unlocking tables are kept hidden... I'd rather be the spoilsport: first, fix the rules and clearly explain how the money is split, then talk about passion. Right now, it feels like L2 projects are arguing over TPS, fees, and subsidies—it's lively, but in the end, it all depends on whose incentives can last longer. Anyway, I always check permissions and unlocking mechanisms before buying—don't use moral coercion as a business model.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin