Recently, people keep asking, "Is on-chain privacy disappearing more and more?"

I think ordinary users should lower their expectations first: on-chain is inherently a ledger, not chat logs.
You can expose less, but don't expect to be completely invisible, especially once it involves fiat currency, exchanges, or KYC,
if someone really wants to track you down, that's just how it is.

The compliance line is more realistic: the tool itself isn't necessarily guilty, but its usage can be easily misunderstood.
To put it simply, if your fund flow is too "fancy," even if you haven't done anything wrong, you might be blocked by risk control for a few days—be mentally prepared.
Now I prefer to split what I can, authorize less where possible, and don't tie all addresses together just for convenience.

Recently, people also complain that validators earn too much, and that MEV and ordering are unfair.
I can understand that; often, you think you're slow, but actually, you've been jumped.
Privacy and fairness are actually connected: the more transparent, the easier it is to audit, but also the easier to be targeted and front-run.
Anyway, I just do small arbitrage, like squeezing through a gap at a red light—don't expect the rules to favor retail investors, just stay alive.