These days, watching governance votes has become a bit exhausting: a bunch of "delegations" ultimately end up being decided by just a few addresses, like a hammer coming down, claiming community co-governance in name but actually more like handing over the remote control to oligarchs. Honestly, who does governance tokens really govern? Most of the time, they influence retail investors' emotions; how proposals are written and the pacing are all in the hands of those few big accounts.

What's even more ironic is that hardware wallets are out of stock, phishing links are rampant, everyone's security awareness is at an all-time high, but when it comes to voting, people just delegate to save trouble... Personally, I’d rather vote a few times less than permanently outsource my authority. I’ll keep an eye on the voting patterns and fund movements of a few delegates; if they start spamming, I’ll remind everyone.