Recently, someone asked me again where the returns from LST/re-staking come from. To put it simply, the main function of LST is still "helping you package the underlying staking rewards into a liquid certificate," with the majority of the yield coming from on-chain block production/validation, plus some liquidity incentives. But these incentives are sometimes like resin in firewood—burning quickly and causing a cough.



Re-staking is more like splitting the same bundle of firewood among more people: you "rent out" the security to other services, and they pay you extra rewards. The problem is—those extra earnings come from taking on more responsibility: you might face penalties, contract issues, service provider problems, or even liquidity runs that cause the LST price to deviate. Recently, there's been chatter in the group about stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and de-pegging rumors. After seeing all this, my eyes are a bit sore. The more I think about it, the more I realize: returns don’t come out of nowhere. The interest others give you is mostly because you’re bearing some tail risk on their behalf.

I prefer to take the slow route of adding firewood myself—only taking a little from what I understand, and the rest I just pretend I didn’t see… for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin