[Full Network Exposure] Sesame Open the Door: A Hundred-Billion Platform Relies on "Phishing Risk Control" to Harvest Partners?

As a long-time user and deep partner of Gate for ten years, I have encountered the most absurd "targeted liquidation" since I started in the industry:
Risks are not intercepted, but reversed and banned after transfer: I withdraw coins and pay business partners, Gate has top-tier on-chain monitoring systems, with zero warnings, zero interceptions, zero alerts on the frontend. As soon as the money is transferred, my account is immediately banned for "high-risk address." May I ask: since you can identify risks, why not intercept at the time of withdrawal? Isn't this just **[Phishing Law Enforcement]**?
Account bans and joint punishment, seizing commissions: Disputes over personal accounts even lead to the suspension of my entire agency’s rebate payments! I’ve worked hard for a year; my referral relationships are my **[core private assets]**. On what grounds do you illegally seize them?
Black-box operations, everyone on edge: According to this logic, in the future, any partner with large transaction volume, Gate can just find a so-called "black address" to transfer funds and directly consume the ecosystem built by the other party?
Although I am a grassroots user, I absolutely do not accept this disguised asset plundering! The communication channels are now paralyzed, and the business side keeps pretending to be dead. Since the platform has chosen the most disgraceful method, I can only withdraw with my clients collectively and publicly expose this harvesting logic across the internet.
Please give a straightforward technical explanation from Gate, rather than a parrot-like perfunctory response!
#Gateio # Sesame Open the Door #维权 # Fake Platform Exposure #Risk Control Black Box