Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently looking at the IBC / cross-chain messaging system, my mind is a bit tangled: a single "send from A to B," in plain terms, who do you really trust?
Lighter approach is trusting both chains themselves plus light client verification, which is still reliable;
heavier approach becomes trusting relays, trusting a bunch of multi-signatures, trusting the operation of a certain "bridge" to not be lazy, or even trusting that it hasn't been MEV sniped away.
Before, when I saw the words "cross-chain," I wanted to rush in, just like when I see a beautiful NFT—hands quick...
Now I pause first: who proves this message?
Can I verify the proof process myself, or do I just have to pray?
By the way, it reminds me of the recent social mining and fan token wave, "attention is mining" sounds pretty exciting, but if in the end it still makes you stake trust on a certain platform / a certain bridge, it just feels like risk is being packaged differently.
Let's see...