Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
$CHIP There are definitely actuaries inside USDAI.
If the opening is within the 300-500 million range,
For players who burn yt, the cost is about 600 million. If they choose to lock yt, then the cost corresponding to unlocking after 8 months is around 370 million.
For players who deposit funds, the cost is around 350 million. If they choose to lock yt, then the cost corresponding to unlocking after 8 months is around 230 million (including the yt cost).
Whether it’s the BOOST mechanism or the opening range, it makes large holders uncomfortable.
Dumping (selling) yt for large holders means losing money; locking yt now also leaves no real room to dump.
Large depositors can make some profit here, but not much, because there’s also the lock yt cost (if you don’t lock and participate in the ICO, there’s some profit, but based on the official dashboard, it isn’t much).
The happiest group should be the large holders in the deposit + airdrop camp.
To go for a squeeze, you need enough short-position counterparties, because currently CHIP is absolutely a high-control market.
No matter what, from the VC perspective, this is definitely a successful project—only a world where users who burn yt get hurt has been achieved.