4% supply has been locked by companies: What changes are happening in the Bitcoin market?

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Crypto often encounters a question: How much impact does MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin buying really have on the market?

Many people believe that the amount bought by one company is insignificant compared with the overall market trading volume. With trading volumes of hundreds of billions of dollars per day, how much of a wave can its purchases really stir up?

This view is quite common. But Coinbase Institutional recently released an analysis report, offering a different judgment.

The report argues that corporate coin hoarding is quietly changing the rules of the Bitcoin game.

An Undervalued Figure

Coinbase’s analysis points out that over the past two years, the share of Bitcoin held by corporate digital asset treasuries of the total supply has quadrupled, surpassing 4%.

Four times. In two years.

This 4% may not sound like much, but you have to know that after these companies buy, they basically don’t sell. They are not traders; they are collectors.

MicroStrategy alone holds more than 780,000 Bitcoins, making it the largest corporate holder in the world.

What does that mean? It means that the amount of Bitcoin that can truly be bought and sold in the market is gradually decreasing. Total supply hasn’t changed, but the portion that is liquid is shrinking.

To put it simply: imagine a pond that originally has 100 fish you can catch. Suddenly, someone uses a net to scoop out 40 fish, trap them in a netted enclosure, and never return them. Then the remaining fish you can catch is only 60. Even though the pond still has 100 fish in total, you can only catch 60.

If that person keeps scooping, the number of fish you can catch will keep getting smaller. With the same fishing rod and bait, the difficulty of catching fish naturally increases.

The Bitcoin market works the same way. Corporate hoarding is essentially pulling more and more Bitcoin out of the circulation pool and locking it into long-term holding vaults.

MicroStrategy’s Strategy Logic

MicroStrategy’s approach is very simple: buy every quarter, publicly commit to continuing to buy, and never sell.

The value of this strategy is not in how much it buys at once, but in that it creates a predictable, one-way flow of demand.

Coinbase’s analysis specifically highlights a mechanism: MicroStrategy’s buying may have limited impact in normal times, but when the price moves to key technical levels, its effect gets amplified.

The reason isn’t hard to understand. With less floating supply in the market, if the price tries to break upward, it may not take as much buy pressure as before to push it. Once the breakout is confirmed, trend traders, quantitative funds, and algorithmic bots will follow, further driving the price.

This isn’t a pump; it’s reducing sell pressure and using the market’s technical structure to magnify volatility.

Of course, Coinbase also acknowledges that this impact is not infinite. ETF inflows/outflows, miners unloading, and derivatives hedging will all dilute MicroStrategy’s effect. But it does exist—and as the corporate hoarding ratio continues to rise, this effect will become more and more obvious.

Market Structure Is Changing

If this trend continues, what will the Bitcoin market look like?

Crypto Chain believes there are several directions worth watching.

First, liquidity distribution will change. As an increasing amount of Bitcoin is locked in corporate treasuries, the share of Bitcoin available for active trading will continue to decline. This means that in certain specific periods—such as the end of a quarter—liquidity could suddenly become very thin.

Second, participant behavior will diverge. Corporate treasuries become the settlement layer; long-term holders act as a reservoir, while ETFs, hedge funds, and retail investors form the trading layer. How these layers interact with each other will change the way the market operates.

Third, the price discovery mechanism will evolve. When most of the supply is held by non-sellers, marginal trades will have a larger influence on price. Market pricing power may become increasingly concentrated in a small number of observable indicators, such as exchange inventories and ETF flows.

Fourth, the characteristics of tail risks will change. On one hand, large holders have aligned incentives, so the market’s resistance to regulatory shocks may improve. On the other hand, if a large holder is forced to sell for some reason, the impact could be amplified. Black swan events will hit harder, but they will occur with lower probability.

All of these are slow changes, measured over years. They are not things that will happen in the next quarter.

What Long-Term Participants Think

For long-term believers who don’t do short-term trading, the significance of this trend is not that you should act on it, but that you understand what is happening in the market.

Crypto Chain has a few thoughts for reference.

First, focus on structural indicators. Corporate holding proportions, exchange balances, and the movements of long-term holders—these are more worth paying attention to than daily price fluctuations. They are slow variables, but they have far-reaching effects.

Second, be clear about your own positioning. Ordinary participants don’t have quarterly disclosure pressure, don’t have shareholders watching them, and their capital scales are flexible. These are advantages, not disadvantages. There’s no need to try to replicate MicroStrategy’s strategy, and you don’t need to compete with institutions.

Finally, understand the characteristics of different instruments. Spot Bitcoin is held directly, with full autonomy. Bitcoin ETFs have good liquidity and move through compliant channels. MicroStrategy stock provides leveraged exposure, but it comes with company operational risk. Mining company stocks are indirect exposure and tend to have greater volatility. There’s no absolute good or bad—only whether it’s suitable.

Most importantly, Crypto Chain has always stressed: No predictions, no chasing highs, no leverage. The purpose of structural analysis is to understand the environment, not to look for buy or sell signals.

Coinbase’s report reveals a structural shift that is already underway. Corporate treasuries rising from 0 to 4% took two years. How long will it take for the next 4%? No one knows. But the direction is clear.

As Michael Saylor of MicroStrategy said in a tweet after the report was released: you can’t stop Bitcoin.

Crypto Chain thinks the more vivid way to put it is: The threshold for holding 1 BTC will only keep getting higher.

BTC0.95%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin