Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
HKUST's Xu Jialong: The agent moat has not yet solidified; model differences are more reflected in efficiency rather than disruptive breakthroughs
CryptoWorld News reports that on April 21, during the roundtable discussion titled “Decoding Web 4.0: When AI Agents Take Over On-Chain Permissions,” Xu Jialong, Associate Vice President of Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, discussed the “Agent moat” and said that there are differences in the model training paths and technical systems that different AI agents rely on, which leads to a clear split in the real-world user experience. Recently, some new models and tools have shown better performance in generation quality and execution efficiency, and even demonstrate higher ceilings in development output. However, he pointed out that, from the current stage, these differences have not yet formed a decisive generation gap; they are closer to “efficiency improvements” rather than a “paradigm breakthrough.” In other words, competition among agents is still in a phase of rapid evolution, and no stable or insurmountable technical barriers have appeared. The iteration pace of today’s AI agents and large models is extremely fast—new products or new capabilities appear almost every week—driving the industry to keep moving forward. But from the perspective of actual use and business decision-making, whether it’s necessary to continuously and frequently track these changes still requires careful evaluation.