Today I saw in the group again that some "coincidental transfer" looks like insider trading. At first, I also frowned along with it, but then I casually broke down the path myself: first, it comes out of the exchange's hot wallet, passes through a couple of hops into a common aggregation address, then loops around to a cross-chain bridge entry point, and finally lands at that "suspicious" address. To put it simply, many times it's just automated arbitrage/aggregation + bridging; on-chain it looks like a show, but actually the process is too long.

Recently, the "yield stacking" of staking and shared security has been criticized as a copycat scheme. I can understand that—more steps mean higher explanation costs, and in the end, everyone is left with just emotions. My current approach is very simple: every time I see something abnormal, I first record it in my shell ledger, noting the transaction fee, number of hops, and destination. If I can explain it, I do; if I can't, I treat it as noise. Don't impulsively add to positions... that's how I'll do it for now.