Lately, I keep hearing people say that "modular chains" are so advanced. To be honest, for someone like me, a regular end-user, the most obvious changes are just two: they don’t feel so laggy when using them, and the transaction fees aren’t ridiculously high all the time. No matter how fancy the other concepts sound, if I tap confirm in my wallet and the experience still sucks, all that is just pointless.

But I don’t feel completely detached… Sometimes you notice that the same app jumps back and forth between different chains/layers, like walking through an exhibition hall from one room to another. The aesthetic flow is consistent, but the payment and settlement are switching tracks behind the scenes. Yesterday, I checked on-chain, and a mint calldata only had that 0x9f3a prefix, ending up on another DA. I had to open two tabs in my block explorer to compare, which felt pretty split.

I think the kind of economic collapse in blockchain games isn’t really related to whether they’re modular or not. Inflation, studios, and coin price spirals can still drag you down. Just because the tech makes the road smooth doesn’t mean the car won’t flip over. Anyway, what I care more about now is whether asset transfers will fragment royalties and liquidity even more. It looks good on paper, but when I try to sell, I find no buyers… Let’s just watch and see slowly.