Cardano Creator: XRP Holders Have No Legal Ownership Ripple's Other Assets

@media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:320px;height:100px;} } @media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:728px;height:90px;} }

A recent statement from Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano, has drawn attention to the structural relationship between XRP and Ripple.

In an X post highlighted by crypto enthusiast Diana, Hoskinson addressed a fundamental misunderstanding among XRP holders about ownership and rights of the ecosystem.

In a broadcast with CryptoWendyO, Hoskinson argued that XRP holders have no legal ownership of assets acquired by Ripple. He stated directly, “XRP holders have no legal ownership of those assets,” emphasizing that any business expansions or acquisitions made by Ripple remain under the company’s control rather than extending to token holders.

Claims About Supply Distribution and Business Model

Hoskinson also revisited longstanding criticisms about XRP’s initial distribution. He claimed that Ripple retained approximately 70% to 80% of the total supply during the project’s early stages.

Based on this premise, he described what he believes to be a recurring operational model in which Ripple generates attention through announcements, influences XRP’s market price, sells portions of its holdings, and uses the proceeds to acquire other assets.

According to his remarks, these acquired assets belong exclusively to Ripple as a corporate entity. He stressed that XRP holders cannot redeem their tokens for equity, business interests, or cash flows associated with those acquisitions.

Hoskinson added that even if Ripple develops new financial infrastructure or expands into additional ventures, the XRP token itself does not grant holders any claim over those developments.

He concluded that the token “doesn’t really have much to say or do with that,” backing his position that XRP operates independently from the ownership structure of Ripple’s broader business activities.

Community Responses Highlight Legal Distinctions

He added that XRP’s value proposition is tied to its role within the broader financial network Ripple is building, suggesting that growth in that ecosystem could still influence the asset’s value.

Ongoing Debate Over XRP’s Role

Hoskinson’s remarks, as reported in Diana’s X post, reflect an ongoing debate within the cryptocurrency sector about how digital assets relate to the entities that develop or promote them. His comments focus specifically on the absence of legal claims for XRP holders over Ripple’s assets, while responses from the community emphasize that this distinction is already understood and, in some cases, seen as necessary from a regulatory standpoint.

The exchange highlights differing interpretations of XRP’s role, particularly regarding whether its value should be viewed independently of Ripple’s corporate activities or as indirectly influenced by them.

Disclaimer*: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.*