Recently, I've been looking at the controversy over NFT secondary royalties again. Basically, both buyers and sellers want to save money, and creators have to rely on this to keep going. In the past, I misjudged prices when moving positions, and helping projects with some liquidity was fine. Now I see that many markets default to "optional royalties," which means those who are honest end up losing out, and everyone is starting to test each other's bottom lines.

I'm now more concerned about whether the contract layer has fixed the royalties or at least has a less awkward profit-sharing mechanism; otherwise, relying on moral constraints is too虚 (vague/ineffective). On the macro side, we're still discussing rate cut expectations, the US dollar index, and risk assets rising and falling together. When emotions run high, transaction fees are considered expensive, let alone paying extra royalties. Anyway, I don't take sides; the best way to help creators survive shouldn't rely solely on secondary commissions—it's too passive.