Recently, I saw everyone talking about re-staking and shared security. Basically, it's about dividing the same security into many parts and selling them. The returns seem to stack up, and I get tempted, but what I care more about is: if something goes wrong on one side, will the penalties also stack up? It's okay if staking yields are low; the key is being able to sleep peacefully. Later, I realized that what I am most likely to stack up isn't the returns, but the illusion of "it probably won't be my turn"... So now, when I look at projects, I first check the health of the validators and whether the penalty trigger conditions are clearly written; if it's too complicated, I just skip it. By the way, I also thought about the recent NFT royalty disputes—creators want stable income, but traders are worried about liquidity being locked up. It's quite similar to shared security, where "who bears the cost" is a big question. Everyone wants to be worry-free, but someone still has to pay the bill. That's all for now.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin