Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I saw everyone talking about re-staking and shared security. Basically, it's about dividing the same security into many parts and selling them. The returns seem to stack up, and I get tempted, but what I care more about is: if something goes wrong on one side, will the penalties also stack up? It's okay if staking yields are low; the key is being able to sleep peacefully. Later, I realized that what I am most likely to stack up isn't the returns, but the illusion of "it probably won't be my turn"... So now, when I look at projects, I first check the health of the validators and whether the penalty trigger conditions are clearly written; if it's too complicated, I just skip it. By the way, I also thought about the recent NFT royalty disputes—creators want stable income, but traders are worried about liquidity being locked up. It's quite similar to shared security, where "who bears the cost" is a big question. Everyone wants to be worry-free, but someone still has to pay the bill. That's all for now.