Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I've seen discussions in the secondary market about reducing royalties to nearly zero, claiming it's to "make trading more free," but it's quite awkward for creators: when a work becomes popular and liquidity is there, the ongoing income from creation disappears. When I see high APY, I first ask where the money comes from; similarly, with royalties, it's essentially about where the long-term incentives come from to keep the system alive.
Not to mention that recently some places have tightened or loosened regulations on taxes and compliance, and as deposit and withdrawal expectations change, everyone's first reaction is still to prioritize survival and cash out first. Who still has the patience to support creators? I personally now prefer to split my positions into smaller parts, even if it means earning a little less in fees or "wool," rather than believing that the ecosystem will self-repair... If you really like a certain creator, you might still need to think about how to support them outside the chain. Anyway, I find it quite tangled.