Lately I keep seeing people interpret large on-chain transfers and hot/cold wallets on exchanges as "smart money." I also get the itch to join in... But honestly, AI agents that keep an eye on the chain are just good at "discovering" — they’re not good at "taking responsibility." When it comes to actually placing orders, slippage, authorization, whether the contract address has been changed, or liquidity suddenly being pulled — these pitfalls still require humans to cover. Otherwise, if it follows the rules and something goes wrong, who takes the blame?



These days I’ve learned to be cautious: I set alerts and limits first — only pop up notifications when the price hits, no automatic buying, and cap the maximum amount per order. It was tough at first, feeling like I’d miss out and lose money, FOMO making my heart itch; but after a few times, I realized that being warned and stopped actually kept me calm, allowing me to take a closer look at links and authorization records… Anyway, with small positions, staying alive is more important than "following the smart money."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin