Recently, I've seen everyone connecting AI Agents on the blockchain, which definitely saves effort, but I've always had a concern: some steps still require human oversight. For example, during authorization, the contract is a long string, and it can be overwhelming to look at. Even the smartest Agent could be fooled by an interface that "looks" legitimate; and for tagging/attribution, isn't it true that tools are lagging behind and can still be misled? I now generally don't fully trust ready-made tags; I prefer to quickly check the upstream and downstream addresses to see the path. It’s slower, but more reliable.



Honestly, Agents are suitable for running processes, but not for bearing the consequences. Especially with limits, permissions, and cross-chain operations—one wrong click can be hard to fix. Recently, I’ve set smaller goals: I’d rather do fewer interactions, spend an extra two minutes verifying each time, and stick with it longer, rather than being carried away by emotions. If I make a mistake, so be it—at least I won’t lose because I didn’t read carefully.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin