Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, there was news that Iran announced it accepts Bitcoin payments, but interestingly, some senior figures in the crypto community remain skeptical. Artur Hayes pointed out a key issue in the discussion — without seeing on-chain transaction data, all of this is just talk.
It does make sense when you think about it. If Iran is truly using Bitcoin for international payments, there should be traces on the blockchain, which cannot be forged. But so far, we haven't seen any large-scale on-chain transfer records related to this. Artur Hayes's attitude actually reflects the consensus of the entire crypto community: talk is cheap, show me the blockchain.
His statement is quite sharp — suggesting that this is more like Iran joking with the Western financial system. Indeed, in the current geopolitical environment, Iran's announcement to accept cryptocurrency payments might be more of a political gesture than a real economic move. Artur Hayes reminds us to look at actual on-chain data, not be swayed by surface-level news.
This kind of rational skepticism is very important in the crypto market. Often, headlines seem shocking, but the actual on-chain activity is quite ordinary. If Iran were truly using Bitcoin on a large scale for payments and settlements, it should produce clear signals on the blockchain. Since we haven't seen that yet, Artur Hayes's skepticism is still worth considering.