Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just caught something interesting brewing in the policy space. The banking lobby is getting pretty vocal about stablecoins, and honestly, they're raising a point worth paying attention to.
So here's the tension: while the White House was basically saying "don't worry, restricting stablecoin yields would only add $2.1 billion in lending," the American Bankers Association is calling that completely missing the real issue. They're not focused on lending metrics at all. What they're actually concerned about is whether interest-bearing stablecoins could trigger a massive deposit exodus from traditional banks.
The numbers are wild. According to a 2025 Treasury estimate, if stablecoins really take off and offer competitive yields, we could be looking at $6.6 trillion moving out of the U.S. banking system. That's not small change.
But here's where it gets more nuanced than just "big scary number." The real damage might not be evenly distributed. The ABA economists are pointing out that even if total money in the financial system stays constant, capital would likely flow from smaller community banks to the mega-institutions. Smaller banks would then be forced to tap expensive wholesale borrowing markets, which drives up costs for local businesses and tightens credit in rural areas. That's actually a legitimate structural concern.
I think what's happening here is pretty clear. Businesses and households have rational financial incentives to move toward stablecoins when they're offering better returns than traditional savings accounts. Banks have gotten comfortable paying basically nothing on deposits for years, so when crypto offers an alternative, people naturally gravitate there. It's competitive pressure, pure and simple.
The crypto side has a point too. If stablecoins force traditional banks to actually compete on yield, maybe that's not the worst outcome. But the banking sector's worry about community bank destabilization isn't just lobbying noise—there's real economic structure at stake.
This is apparently become a major sticking point in Senate negotiations over crypto regulation. Whether stablecoins can legally offer yields is now one of the key obstacles to getting a bill through. Interesting to watch how this plays out, because the outcome could reshape how both traditional and crypto finance operate.