Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Stopping loss is really a bit like breaking up: the worst part isn't losing that one time, but knowing something's wrong yet stubbornly holding on, staring at the chart every day, looking for reasons to keep yourself alive. Frankly, the price has no obligation to return to your break-even point, and the token model won't suddenly improve just because you have "faith." When the release rhythm, incentive structure, or boundary conditions change, the narrative collapses quietly.
Recently, I've seen people interpret ETF capital flows, U.S. stock risk appetite, and crypto market rises and falls all together, which sounds smooth, but I force myself to ask: can this explanation be applied to "the exit conditions for my position"? Otherwise, it's just giving a fancy excuse to delay stopping loss.
I'm currently doing it very simply: before entering, clearly write down "what I look like when I'm wrong," and when triggered, just exit—no emotional attachment. But every time I actually press the button, I still feel annoyed, like admitting I was wrong... but dragging it out is more annoying, and I have to pay emotional interest. Let's just leave it at that for now.