Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Lately I've been looking at a few old NFT projects again, the floor prices fluctuate like a thermometer, sometimes hot, sometimes cold, but what I care more about is where the liquidity actually is: placing a bunch of orders, but only a few actual transactions, that kind of "seems lively" feeling is pretty deceptive. Royalties are also quite realistic; when the market is bad, everyone first seeks to survive, and no matter how grand the narrative, it can't beat the feeling of running out of breath. I used to be led by community stories, thinking "as long as there's consensus"; now I prefer to check the on-chain transaction history, where the funds are coming from and going to, and see if there are any strange cross-chain inflows on the other side of the bridge... Anyway, after tracking too many security incidents, I realize that in terms of heat, speed of withdrawal is more reliable than hype. By the way, I want to complain that recently I've been using ETF capital flows and US stock risk appetite to explain crypto price movements; it sounds plausible, but when it comes to NFTs, which have even thinner liquidity, a shift in sentiment just turns into slippage and finger-pointing. That's all for now.