Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Spent several days testing OpenAI Codex
Even with GPT-5.4 xhigh (highest reasoning level) enabled,
the main model still makes quite a few mistakes.
For example, once it misunderstood the instructions and directly deleted things it shouldn't have. Another time was even more outrageous: it thought it had successfully written the code, but in reality, it hadn't.
The same mistake was made three times, each time only caught by Opus during review afterward.
My current conclusion is that Codex is very suitable as a tool, giving it clear coding tasks it can do quickly and well.
But to use it as the main model to understand complex multi-step instructions or decide whether to act? Still falls short.
For now, I will still primarily rely on Opus.