Recently, I've seen everyone hype up AI Agents automatically running on the blockchain—it's convenient, no doubt, but I still think some steps need human oversight; otherwise, if something goes wrong, there's no way to even review what happened. For example, during authorization, the Agent might think, "To save time, I'll give unlimited access," but a person needs to watch: who exactly is being authorized, where the selling pressure might come from later, and whether it can be revoked if issues arise. Another example is signing; phishing links have been rampant lately, hardware wallets are out of stock, and many people can only use hot wallets... At these times, I’m a bit hesitant to let the Agent click on unfamiliar dApps. Anyway, my current habit is: let it automate what it can, but for critical steps like "grant permissions / change addresses / cross-chain transfers," I still confirm manually. If it takes a bit longer, so be it—at least I know what's going on.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin