Recently, the community has been arguing about privacy coins and coin mixing, and it's both funny and frustrating: on one hand, shouting "privacy is a basic right," and on the other, pretending that compliance is someone else's problem... To put it simply, ordinary users shouldn't expect to always hide in the fog. On-chain data is publicly available to an absurd degree, and the mindset of "just wash it and it's clean" is quite dangerous; often, it's just delaying trouble.



My current expectation is very simple: the privacy that should exist (don't reveal your salary, address, or assets all at once) is understandable, but once it involves tools or methods that clearly evade regulation, treat them as having a "higher probability of scrutiny." During my evening review, I prefer to earn a little less and clearly define the boundaries—keep positions smaller, sources clearer—so that if my account gets questioned someday, I won't be caught off guard. Anyway, don't mistake "technically possible" for "nothing will happen in reality."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin