The third time I see everyone hyping up AI Agents to fully automate on-chain operations, my first reaction is still: if something really goes wrong, who will take responsibility? During the authorization step, if the contract gives permissions it shouldn't, or the limits aren't set properly, no matter how smart the Agent is, it can still send itself away with a single click; then there are middle steps like routing or cross-chain transfers—slippage, retries on failure, assets stuck halfway—ultimately, someone still has to watch and manually withdraw or change the route. And for governance voting or signatures, many of the phrases sound quite “rational,” but who exactly are they serving? Someone needs to translate proposals into plain language. Recently, fee rates have become extreme, and in the group, people are arguing whether to reverse the trend or keep squeezing the bubble—I’m just holding off for now… Agents can help me monitor data, but when it comes to pressing confirm, I still fear the pain more myself.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin