Lately, discussing stablecoins feels a bit like my own mindset has undergone a "version update": I used to focus on whether the peg was 1-to-1, panicking when it de-anchored; now I care more about what supports it, whether reserves are communicated clearly or not. The more opaque the information, the easier it is to trigger a chain reaction of runs. To put it simply, people don't distrust the peg itself, they distrust the "explanations."

In the group, some are shouting about hardware wallets being out of stock, while others are clicking phishing links and losing accounts... Security awareness is also Schrödinger's cat. Anyway, my current approach is pretty simple: I avoid chasing that tiny interest, diversify my holdings, and when I see transparency starting to dodge the issue, I withdraw early—don't wait for emotions to infect you. Post-meeting reviews are much more useful than just arguing during the meeting.