Recently, there's been more talk about secondary market royalties, basically saying "I support creators, but I don't want to pay." It's quite realistic: royalties are not a moral issue, but an enforcement issue. You can't stop on-chain buying and selling; the only things you can control are the front end and liquidity. The result is that whoever controls the entry point makes the rules, and creators are instead placed there as mascots.

I prefer to look at data rather than feel-good stories: which markets have turned off royalties, whether the trading volume of certain series is short-term spikes or sustainable, whether wallet behaviors show obvious signs of "arbitrage - wash trading," and a quick look at timestamps makes it clear. Just like the recent extreme discussions about funding rates, many people are tangled up in whether to reverse or continue to inflate the bubble. I just want to ask: who is paying the fees, who is receiving subsidies, and who is transferring risk? The same applies to the royalty disputes—don't just mouth support; on-chain records are much more honest than words.