Actually, everyone understands that on-chain liquidation is often not about using too much leverage, but about being caught by the "feeding price" rhythm.


When the oracle delays, the platform still calculates your position based on the old price, and the market has already turned.
You think you're safe, but the next second, the price jumps and breaks through the line, and liquidation feels like someone hit fast-forward.
The most annoying thing is that some people blame you for "not setting a stop-loss"...
Yesterday, I watched a certain pool, the feeding price was half a beat slow, and when the liquidation waterfall came, funds flowed out faster than words, and no one should pretend to be innocent.

By the way, recently that social mining/fan token "attention is mining" setup sounds pretty good, but when it comes to liquidation, you realize:
Attention is worthless, delay is valuable—what matters is that someone sees the real price one second earlier than you.
Anyway, when I look at projects now, I first check the oracle source, update frequency, and anomaly protection.
Don’t talk to me about narratives; narratives can't save a liquidation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin