Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I've been thinking about what actually made Warren Buffett's investment philosophy so effective, and it keeps coming back to one simple idea: index funds.
Not the flashy stock picks. Not the complex strategies. Just index funds.
Back in his 2016 shareholder letter, Buffett was pretty direct about this. When people asked him for investment advice, his consistent answer was the same thing—put your money in a low-cost S&P 500 index fund and let it sit. This wasn't some new theory he was testing. He'd been saying it for years.
What's interesting is how well this actually works if you run the numbers. The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF tracks 500 large U.S. companies across all sectors. You get exposure to everything from Apple and Nvidia at the top, down through Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Tesla, and dozens of others. It's basically owning a slice of the entire U.S. economy.
Here's where it gets compelling: the S&P 500 has returned about 10.86% annually over the last 30 years. If you invested just $400 monthly at a slightly more conservative 10.5% annual return, you'd be looking at roughly $78,000 after 10 years, $291,000 after 20 years, and about $868,200 after 30 years. That's with dividends reinvested.
The expense ratio on this fund is only 0.03%—basically nothing. You're paying $3 annually per $10,000 invested.
What really validates Buffett's index funds approach is the data on professional money managers. Only 4% of large-cap funds beat the S&P 500 over the last five years. Over 20 years? Just 2%. That's stunning when you think about it. Massive institutional investors with teams of analysts consistently underperform a simple, passive index fund strategy.
Buffett's logic was always straightforward: index funds require virtually no work, they've made money consistently over long periods, and they beat what most professionals can deliver. The S&P 500 has generated positive returns over every rolling 11-year period in the last three decades. If you bought at any point and held for at least 11 years, you made money.
There's something almost counterintuitive about it—the simplest strategy often wins. But that's what the numbers show. When you look at what actually works in markets, index funds keep coming up as the answer that Buffett keeps recommending.