In the evening, I reviewed a few DAO voting proposals. Basically, on the surface, it's "community decision-making," but in reality, they are all about how to distribute incentives, whose votes are more valuable. Who gets subsidies, how delegated voting power is concentrated, how to set voting thresholds—all of this essentially maps out the power structure, but everyone is too lazy to read the attachments carefully... I’ve also been burned before, voting based on emotions, only to realize I was just endorsing a small circle.

And now, AI Agents and automated trading are starting to be integrated into governance: on one hand, they boast about "fully automated on-chain participation," but on the other hand, the contract permissions are quite broad, which makes me a bit uneasy. Anyway, I’d rather cast fewer votes now than click confirm without understanding the incentives and permissions, keeping my position and boundaries clear first.