Watching the AI agent go on-chain and interact for the third time, I feel like it can do physical work for me, but when it comes to the critical step, a human still needs to cover the final responsibility. For example, signing—checking the scope of authorization, whether it's unlimited, whether there are pools embedded in the routing, no matter how smart the agent is, it’s easy for it to just “confirm according to the process.” Another example is stablecoin rebalancing—when encountering low liquidity, sudden slippage spikes, or pool parameter changes, it will continue trading according to preset rules, but a person needs to watch the stop-loss line and the timing for canceling orders. Also, regarding cross-chain/deposit and withdrawal, there have been recent reports of increased taxes and tighter compliance in certain regions, which quickly shifts expectations. On-chain runs on panic or premiums happen fast, and the agent won't make the decision for you on “whether to act today.” Anyway, my current approach is: let it calculate, let it run simulations, but I must personally review the final signature and large transactions to avoid waking up to find I’ve given the entire world unlimited authorization.