Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Been digging into something that might surprise a lot of people focused on real estate investing. The gap between how stocks and real estate have actually performed is pretty wild.
So Warren Buffett recently got asked why he keeps buying stocks instead of piling into real estate, and his answer was straightforward - there's just way more opportunity in the stock market. Most people assume real estate is the better play, especially when they see home prices that have doubled in the last decade or so. But here's the thing: stocks have done even better. Way better.
Looking at the actual numbers over the past 30 years tells the real story. Residential real estate values went from around 80 back in March 1995 to about 328 by March 2025 - that's roughly a 309% return. Not bad, right? But compare that to what happened in the stock market during the same period.
The S&P 500 went from 533 to almost 5,912. That's a 1,008% return. The Dow climbed from 4,465 to 42,270 - an 847% gain. And the Nasdaq? That tech-heavy index absolutely exploded from 865 to 19,114, delivering a 2,111% return. The difference is honestly not even close.
When you look at real estate returns over the last 20 years specifically, residential property appreciated significantly, but the stock market's performance in that same window makes it look almost pedestrian by comparison. Even commercial real estate, which some investors swear by, typically returns between 6-12% annually - and that's still getting beaten by long-term stock market averages.
The interesting part is that commercial real estate also tends to suffer longer and deeper downturns than stocks do. So you're taking on more risk for lower returns, which doesn't exactly make it the obvious choice.
Obviously diversification matters, and real estate still plays a role in most portfolios. But if you're trying to build serious wealth, the data from the last couple of decades pretty clearly shows where the real returns have been. The stock market has just been the dominant wealth-building tool, hands down.
If you've been sitting mostly in real estate, might be worth reconsidering how much of your portfolio is actually in equities. The real estate returns over the past 20 years have been solid, but missing out on what stocks delivered? That's a much bigger opportunity cost than most people realize.