Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
So I've been thinking about Warren Buffett and gold lately, especially after that wild move Berkshire made back in 2020. You know the one - the guy who's spent decades trashing gold suddenly buys 21 million shares of Barrick Gold for half a billion dollars. Everyone lost their minds thinking the Oracle had finally changed his tune. But here's the thing about Warren Buffett and his actual stance on gold - it's way more nuanced than a single investment decision.
Let me break down what Buffett has actually said about gold over the years, because it's pretty consistent and honestly kind of brutal in how logical it is.
First, there's this quote from his 2011 shareholder letter that basically sums up his whole philosophy. He said gold has two significant shortcomings - it doesn't produce anything and you can't really use it for much beyond decoration or limited industrial purposes. If you own one ounce of gold forever, you'll still own one ounce at the end. That's it. No growth, no productivity. For a value investor like Buffett, that's basically disqualifying.
Then in 2009 on CNBC, he got even more direct about it. He said gold won't do anything between now and then except look at you. Compare that to a stock like Coca-Cola that actually generates money. That's the core difference for him - he wants assets that produce value over time, not just sit there hoping someone pays more later.
But here's where it gets interesting. Buffett also acknowledged that gold is basically a bet on fear. He said it pretty clearly - people buy gold when they're afraid, and if fear increases you make money, if it decreases you lose money. Gold itself doesn't produce anything though. During the 2011 CNBC appearance, he went even further with this idea. He basically said if you had to choose between all the world's gold and all of America's farmland plus seven ExxonMobils plus a trillion dollars in cash, any rational person takes the farmland and oil companies. That's his whole philosophy right there.
So what about that Barrick investment? Honestly, it might not have been Buffett himself making that call, and even if it was, buying shares in a gold mining company is different from buying gold bullion. Plus Berkshire got out after just two quarters - long enough to ride the COVID crisis bump but not a long-term conviction play. That tracks with everything Warren Buffett has said about gold for the past 15 years.
The guy's been remarkably consistent. He doesn't hate gold as a concept, he just thinks it's a terrible investment for anyone serious about building wealth. And when you look at his actual track record versus pure gold holdings, it's hard to argue with his logic. That's the real story here - not whether he changed his mind, but why his original skepticism about gold has held up so well.