Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Lately I've been thinking about on-chain privacy. To be honest, ordinary users shouldn't expect "complete anonymity," but more like "being less likely to be easily matched with a quick search." The compliance boundaries are also quite realistic: every step you take on the chain is like leaving footprints, just see who comes to pick them up and what rules they use to do so.
And now, those on-chain data tools and tagging systems are criticized for being outdated and can still be misleading. I believe in them... Once a tag is applied, it seems to define the nature, but the underlying evidence chain is often just that, and the risk of misjudgment is not low. Anyway, my expectation is: privacy is a cost, not a switch; compliance is a framework, not a talisman. When I encounter uncertain interactions, I first take a screenshot as a small ritual, so that if something really happens, I can at least prove part of it myself.