Lately, reviewing DAO proposals has been a bit exhausting. On the surface, it's about "optimizing incentives" and "promoting the ecosystem," but only at the end do I realize that voting rights and distribution criteria have quietly changed. The power structure just shifts a little... To put it plainly, incentives are not candy; they are the steering wheel. Then outside, Layer 2 is still arguing over TPS/fees/subsidies, it's lively, but what I care more about is: who takes the subsidies, who has the final say after they are taken, and whether governance will turn into "the one who subsidizes the most has the loudest voice."

Right now, I look at proposals by first checking permissions, unlock times, voting thresholds, and execution paths. If the safety clauses aren't clearly written, I directly oppose—it's pretty outrageous. Anyway, better to be cautious so that later someone doesn't just say "the community has agreed." Sigh, that's all for now.