Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I saw someone criticizing MEV and unfair ordering, saying that on-chain transactions are being "cut in line." Basically, the biggest impact is on small users who place large slippage and are in a rush to get in: you think pressing confirm puts you in line, but in reality, it’s a signal to others that you’re willing to be a "sheep." Large funds are more likely to split orders and set limit prices, making it less easy to be drained.
Now I look at projects not only for permissions and LP locks but also for the routing of commonly used interaction addresses: which platform they go through, whether there are strange intermediary contracts, as avoiding those can reduce the chances of getting caught off guard. Recently, hardware wallets are out of stock again, and phishing links are everywhere… In such an environment, rushing and clicking without checking addresses is probably not very friendly. Anyway, I’d rather be a bit slower and pay fewer tuition fees.