Lately, as I look into things like IBC and message passing, the more I look, the more the two words “cross-chain” feel like a love letter: no matter how romantic it’s written, in the end it all comes down to whether you trust the person who delivers the message. A cross-chain, put simply, requires trusting a whole string of components: the chain itself must not go down, the light client/verification logic must not be written incorrectly, the relayer (the courier) must not cause trouble, and the channel/client state must not get stuck; if it’s the bridge setup, you probably also have to trust an additional layer of multi-signatures/verifiers/oracles—these “middlemen.”



Then outside, the L2s argue about TPS, fees, and subsidies every day. Listening to it, it feels like bargaining at a market… but when you actually toss your assets over, what I’m still asking in my heart is: who is backing this message for me? If something goes wrong, who can I go to?

Next time, I might first write “who exactly am I trusting?” in the transaction memo, even if that’s pretty dumb. Before you do a cross-chain transfer, what small checks do you do, or do you just follow the flow and go with it on luck?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin