Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Last night, I organized interaction checklists for several creator projects, and while at it, I flipped to the secondary market and saw more debates about royalties, basically arguing whether "voluntary" counts as a commitment. I got a bit scared: not long ago, I almost included a platform's "royalty-free" policy as a standard approach in the checklist, but after carefully reviewing the terms, I realized that creators were basically being forced to give concessions... If I had actually published that, I bet many people would follow suit, and if creators later criticize me, I wouldn't be wrong.
Recently, some people have been interpreting ETF capital flows, U.S. stock risk appetite, and coin price fluctuations as tightly linked, which is getting tiresome. I can't control how hot money comes and goes. But when it comes to the creator economy, if even the most basic question of "can we trust the rules" turns into a gamble, then all that's left is speculation. For now, I’ll mark "royalty enforcement methods" separately in red in my checklists so I won't step into the same pit again.