Here comes another "coincidental transfer," is it really just good luck that it all happens to match? Fine, fine, I get it—there's no ID on the chain, but the path can still be traced: first, check if the source of funds is the same batch of entry (same exchange hot wallet / same bridge), then see if there's any "cleaning" action in the middle (multi-hop, small dispersed amounts, fixed intervals), and finally, see if the destination is the same set of receiving addresses or contract interaction habits. Many people only focus on the last hop and start shouting conspiracy; actually, it looks more like the same group of people following the same process. Recently, retail traders have been criticizing validators for MEV extraction and unfair ordering, but I think this explanation makes more sense: you think it's a coincidence, but in reality, everyone is just avoiding the same knife, fighting for the same queue position... To put it plainly, the most common thing on the chain isn't "seems like a coincidence" standard operating procedures.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin