These days, the more I look at projects on RWA blockchain, the more I feel: that little "liquidity" on the chain often looks very bright like a spotlight, but when it comes to redemption, you realize there are a bunch of hurdles. The terms mention delays, limits, who has the final interpretive authority... Honestly, clicking "sell" on the chain is completely different from that.

Recently, the staking/sharing security model has been criticized as a "recursive trap," and I also resonate a bit: seeing the returns stack up looks great, but whether the underlying can pay on time or who bears the risk if something goes wrong is what I care about more. Anyway, my current habit is still the same: first test the new protocol with a isolated address, and only consider adding more once the redemption process works smoothly. If it's a bit troublesome, so be it.