Recently, I looked into several blockchain game pools, and it feels like the old problems are back: once the gates open for production, inflation first suppresses the token price, and the pool looks like it’s “earning quite high,” but in reality, it’s just paying you with faster devaluation. Early participants can leave quickly and cash out, but those who come later become the ones holding the liquidity bag. The thinner the liquidity, the more unstable it gets, and in the end, everyone blames the project team for running away... Basically, the economic system has no safety net, relying on token issuance to keep it alive.



Now, AI Agents and automated trading are trending again. Some people use them to talk about “intelligent on-chain interactions,” while others are really digging into permissions, signatures, and contract risks. I personally care more about the latter: the more bots there are, the faster things can go wrong.

I take simplicity as a trap: a phrase like “stable high yield,” just hearing it makes me want to step back first. Let’s leave it at that.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin