Today, while tidying up the desk, I saw a bunch of chargers and suddenly thought that modular blockchains might be like this for ordinary people: you don't care which wire is responsible for fast charging or which wire is responsible for data transfer, you just want "plug and play, no sparks." Modularization separates execution, settlement, and data, and frankly, what users perceive is: signing once in the wallet, more predictable confirmation times, and fees and speeds that don't fluctuate wildly.

But in reality... after incidents like cross-chain bridge thefts, people still subconsciously prefer to "wait for confirmation first," and this is even more obvious when oracles report errors: they'd rather be slower but more certain. For someone like me who has managed treasury in a DAO, what I care about most is whether permissions and boundaries are clear and well-defined. The more modular and detailed the interfaces, the more points of contact there are, and whoever can operate which part must be hardcoded; otherwise, as more chargers are bought, eventually no one dares to plug in anything that might not be usable.