Recently, people have been using "on-chain coincidence transfers" as a form of mysticism, claiming that if the same amount hits the same address at the same time, it's insider trading... But I see it more as a matter of the path not being broken down. To put it simply, break down the origin of the funds, how they are routed, and where they finally land into three segments: hot wallets on exchanges moving in and out, routing aggregators / cross-chain bridges transferring, and then multi-signature or contract positions. Once this chain is completed, it looks like a "sudden synchronization." Combine that with nonce, the same batch of gas strategies, and whether the transactions are bundled by the same contract in the middle, and you can explain about 80% of it. The biggest concern on the order book side is fake liquidity; on-chain, it's the same. Surface-level alignment doesn't mean the same hand is involved. Anyway, first clarify the path before getting emotional. Modular / DeFi narrative developers are ecstatic, while users are completely confused. It's actually understandable: layer upon layer, in the end, all they see is "why did it transfer again?" Forget it, let's not talk about conspiracy theories.