I muted the group, and the world suddenly feels much more peaceful.

In the past, I was annoyed by a bunch of "please go vote" @ messages, but after calming down, I realized that many proposals are written like technical discussions, when in fact they are just hiding incentives in the corners: who gets subsidies, who controls the signing authority, who can change parameters...
Basically, it's just rearranging power.

These days, cross-chain bridges are being hacked again, and oracle errors are happening, and everyone is shouting "wait for confirmation."
But I actually want to see how DAOs write "who is responsible when something goes wrong."
Many proposals claim to be decentralized, but ultimately the key permissions are still held by a few addresses.
Even if the TVL looks good, it’s a bit superficial.
Anyway, I’m now focusing on cash flow and permission tables; voting slowly is not a shame.