Today I saw someone use a "coincidental transfer" as material for conspiracy theories again: A transfers to B, B immediately transfers to C, then C goes to DEX for a swap... Honestly, there’s no shortage of "seemingly clever" paths on the blockchain. My habit is to break it down into the most common explanations: Is it a hot wallet/collecting address of a CEX moving funds? Is it a cross-chain bridge relay and change? Is it a batch payroll/airdrop script? Or is it just the same group of people using different addresses for clearing and margin replenishment? Then, by looking at the time intervals, whether the amounts follow a pattern, and if there are fixed "landing points" for merging, you can basically cut the mystery in half.



Recently, the same applies to social mining and fan tokens—people say "attention is mining," but to me, it sounds like packaging traffic as output... Break down the path, and the weak points are often clearer: who bears the inflation, who takes the exit, who has the authority to change permissions. Alright, I’ll stop here.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin