Recently, I've been looking into AI Agents interacting on the blockchain, and I feel it can really save a lot of time, but honestly, the fallback work still has to be done by humans. For example, the authorization/limit step—no matter how smart the agent is, it might still give you unlimited permissions; and cross-chain transfers, route swapping, if slippage acts up, it's not just a "small profit loss," but a direct "lesson learned." I now treat these kinds of operations as high-risk buckets: start with small amounts to test, then scale up. If it were truly one-click fully automatic, I wouldn't be comfortable with it. My partner even teased me, saying, "You’re using AI, but you still drive a manual," and I don’t know either... Anyway, on the blockchain, at the moment of signing, you're the one taking the blame. By the way, I’ve noticed recently everyone is interpreting ETF capital flows, US stock risk appetite, and crypto market rises and falls together—I just see it as a sentiment thermometer. My plan is still to follow the plan; don’t let a day or two of narrative set the rhythm.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin